The family of a teenager who was hit by a driver at a Toronto intersection, previously monitored by an automated speed enforcement (ASE) camera before being removed by Ontario legislation, is taking legal action against the province, city, and driver for substantial financial compensation. Toronto police reported responding to the incident on March 25, where a 15-year-old boy sustained life-threatening injuries after being struck at the intersection of Humber Boulevard N. and Louvain Street. The 71-year-old driver involved in the accident stayed at the scene and was subsequently arrested and charged with dangerous operation and careless driving causing bodily harm.
In a statement filed on September 3 at the Ontario Superior Court, the teen’s family, Adebola and Taiwo Adebayo, claimed that their son suffered severe injuries, including a traumatic brain injury, skull fractures, carotid artery injury, vision loss in one eye, femur fractures, and various cuts and bruises. These injuries have led to ongoing psychological and behavioral issues such as anxiety, depression, and emotional trauma. The family asserts that their son will continue to endure pain and suffering, loss of quality of life, and require ongoing therapy, rehabilitation, and specialized equipment.
The lawsuit alleges that the city and province failed to implement safety measures at the intersection after the removal of the speed camera, which had been operational from April 2025 to November 2025. The passing of Bill 56 in November 2025 mandated the removal of speed cameras across the province, a move criticized by Ontario Premier Doug Ford as a “cash grab.” The lawsuit claims that the province’s actions created a hazardous situation at the intersection and accuses it of disregarding complaints and failing to address the safety concerns.
The intersection where the accident occurred is a common pedestrian route to St. Oscar Romero Catholic Secondary School. The family’s legal representation, including lawyer Patrick Brown, highlighted the alleged operational negligence by the province in failing to replace the removed speed camera with other protective measures in a known dangerous area.
The statement of claim further mentions multiple requests made by a local resident to Toronto’s 311 service to evaluate the safety of pedestrian paths used by students, including the one where the teenager was hit. The city is accused of neglecting its responsibility to ensure pedestrian safety at the crossing despite being aware of the risks. In response, the city spokesperson emphasized the city’s commitment to road safety through various initiatives under the Vision Zero program.
The family is seeking $16 million in damages for the injuries and suffering endured by their son.
