Women and Equalities Minister, Bridget Phillipson, has stated that the recently issued guidance on single-sex spaces may not satisfy everyone but is the appropriate stance to take. She acknowledged the expected ongoing debates, legal disputes, and scrutiny surrounding the guidance, emphasizing that these discussions would have arisen regardless of the content of the new regulations.
During her appearance before the Women and Equalities committee, Phillipson highlighted the importance of not pitting the rights of women against those of transgender individuals, describing the broader conversation as increasingly contentious.
The minister’s appearance marked her first since the release of the revised guidance on single-sex spaces by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) last month. The guidance clarified that facilities such as single-sex toilets, changing rooms, hospital wards, and refuges should be accessed based on an individual’s biological sex to comply with the Equality Act, following a Supreme Court ruling in 2025.
Phillipson emphasized that the new code offers clarity for service providers like gyms, leisure centers, and cafes. She expressed confidence in the balance struck by the code, acknowledging that while it may not please everyone, it is the appropriate position for the Government to take.
Anticipating ongoing debates and challenges, Phillipson emphasized the need for further discussions and legal scrutiny in the contested space. She addressed concerns about the financial implications and broader consequences of legal battles on organizations like Girlguiding, the Women’s Institute, and Parkrun, which have expressed apprehensions.
Parkrun founder, Paul Sinton-Hewitt, highlighted the current challenges faced by the charity, particularly in navigating the gender and sex debate. Despite these challenges, Phillipson believes that the draft code adequately addresses the needs across different protected characteristics.
The minister expressed hope for progress based on the released code, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity while ensuring that both trans individuals and women can access necessary services without conflict. She called for respectful dialogue and understanding, aiming to avoid targeting individuals for their lifestyle choices.
A campaign group, Trans+ Solidarity Alliance, revealed that over 100 MPs have signed an early day motion (EDM) opposing the code, citing it as unjust and unworkable. The group hopes this strong opposition will prompt a reassessment of trans equality policies.
